jump to navigation

Social conservatives finally “mad as hell” December 20, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Uncategorized.
2 comments

Since about the time the Moral Majority coalesced in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Republican establishment has welcomed social conservatives to help get their candidates elected so long as they let their concern for moral issues take a back seat to fiscal policies. The leaders of the pro-family movement have always been more than willing to comply with the demands of the Wall Street insiders just to keep their place at the table. If the unity of this social-fiscal conservative coalition ever fractured, social conservatives bore the brunt of the blame.

And so it goes in the present race for the Republican presidential nomination.  The Republican establishment has once again told social conservatives to suck it in and accept Giuliani as the de facto nominee in spite of their reservations about his record on abortion and the homosexual agenda to redefine marriage. Why? Because Rudy has the fiscal credentials. And right on cue the leaders of the pro-family movement complied, vis-a-vis Pat Robertson.

But just as their leaders were turning left, the rank and file of family values voters turned right, falling in behind Mike Huckabee, much to the chagrin of fiscal conservatives.

Cue Romney - the fiscal conservatives’ alternative to Giuliani. The idea seemed to be to convince the social conservatives that Romney was one of them, only much more refined than that “country bumpkin” Huckabee. The plan went something like this: have Romney deliver a major speech about his faith under the guise of being persecuted because of his faith (even though 80% of potential Republican primary voters polled said Romney’s faith was not an issue for them), and then if anyone questioned his faith, accuse them of being a bigot. Further, have Romney misrepresent seeing his father “marching with Martin Luther King,” as an appeal to the African-American values voter, and then when the record indicates George Romney never marched with MLK, explain it all away by saying the candidate was speaking “figuratively.”

This strategy was suppose to lure the drifting rank and file back into lock step. There was just one problem: social conservatives looked at Romney’s record on social issues and discovered he was “effectively pro-choice” throughout his political career just as he told Tim Russert on a recent edition of Meet the Press. Romney, it turns out, is Giuliani in sheep’s clothing.

“But wait! Romney is a changed man,” you say. We’re all for death-bed repentance, but social conservatives rightly question whether it is possible that a man who has exerted all of his political energies for his entire political life for socially liberal causes can be trusted to appoint justices who will be strict constructionists.

Thus, the Huckasurge. Having been told for 30 years to sit quietly, ”take one for the team,” and let the fiscal issues take precedent, social conservatives are mad as hell and we aren’t taking it anymore. There is a grassroots revolt taking place among the rank and file of social conservatives that has found its voice in Mike Huckabee, leaving the leadership of the pro-family movement wondering where their influence has gone.

Huckabee is not the fiscal conservative the Republican establishment would like. Horror of horrors, he has actually advocated using tax dollars to help the poor. Huckabee, it seems, actually applied what the Gospels say about our responsibility to the poor and suffering to tax policy in Arkansas. On issues like HIV/AIDS, the plight of the inner city poor, and education, Huckabee’s positions are admittedly more center left than center right. And while he believes in securing the border, Huckabee reminds us that there is a lady standing in New York Harbor with a torch raised high, beckoning ”your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free” to come here, to the land of the free. Can we fault them when they actually do?

The Republican establishment has looked down its nose at social conservatives for far too long, tolerating us because they need our votes. But now the tables are turned. The grass roots are looking up at the establishment with the will of a Lech Walesa, demanding that fiscal issues take a back seat to moral issues for a change. It’s long past time for the moral and social issues of our times to be given more than just lip service. It’s now time for our fiscal policies to be informed by our moral/social policies rather than sacrificing our morality to our economic standing in the world.

Don’t expect the Republican establishment to take this lying down. The new media tanks are already rolling to suppress the revolt.

Politico: Romney “pathetic;” Huckabee has Republican establishment in “meltdown” December 19, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney.
2 comments

Rod Dreher at Politico.com comments on Romney’s demand that Mike Huckabee apologize to President Bush for his describing the Bush Administration’s foreign policy as “arrogant”:

The pathetic Romney plaint is the mournful cry of a Republican establishment in meltdown. Last week, National Review Online blogger Lisa Schiffren, a Giuliani backer, laid into Mr. Huckabee with a screed pithily summarized by Mr. Douthat as, “Go back to Dogpatch, you stupid hillbilly.”

Alas for the GOP and for the old guard religious-right leadership, the view from Dogpatch these days is looking up for the populist Huckabee. Could it be that cultural and religious conservatives are fed up with being treated like useful idiots by the Republican establishment?

Romney’s father never marched with MLK December 19, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Mitt Romney.
1 comment so far

During his “Faith in America” speech two weeks ago, Mitt Romney claimed, “I saw my father march with Martin Luther King.” Turns out it never happened:

Frank Lockwood at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette has the story:

Mitt Romney told a national audience: “I saw my father march with Martin Luther King.” But it turns out that Romney and King never marched together. They never marched in the same city. And they never marched on the same day. So what up?

Click here to read the campaign’s explanation.

Would I be a bigot if I asked what the LDS Church teaches about lying?

Christmas Greetings from Team Huckabee December 17, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Huckabee, Huckabee Christmas Ad, Huckabee for President, Mike Huckabee.
9 comments

This should throw Barbara Walters right over the edge.

The Kite Runner December 16, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Khaled Hosseini, The Kite Runner.
4 comments

The Kite RunnerAfghanistan, the Taliban, Islam, faith, friendship, loyalty, and redemption will all have new meaning when you close the last chapter of Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner. Khaled writes his novel from experience, though it is not biographical. He was born in Kabul, Afghanistan in 1965 and raised there until his family relocated to Paris in 1976, ultimately emigrating to the United States in 1980. He graduated from the University of California - San Diego’s School of Medicine in 1993, practicing as an internist from 1996 - 2004. He began writing The Kite Runner in 2001 and it was published in 2003.

From start to finish I didn’t want to put it down, and when I turned the last page I didn’t want it to end. What captivated me is what I believe will also captivate you.

First, what most Americans know of Afghanistan has been shaped by the evening news: seemingly dark, bleak, legalistic. The Kite Runner made the country, and especially Kabul, explode in color and wonder. Khaled Hosseini has succeeded in giving to outsiders a portrait of his homeland most of us have never seen: the political world of 1970s Afghanistan, from its peaceful days prior to the Russian invasion to the hope promised by the triumph of the Taliban, to hopes crushed under the tyrannical legalism ultimately imposed by those the Afghani people originally saw as liberators. As you follow his story it is impossible not to become an Afghani patriot, broken hearted as you remember what your country once was and what it now is.

Second, Kahled’s portrait of childhood friendship in 1970s Kabul was not unlike the childhood I experienced in suburban Detroit during the same time period, a vivid portrait of the universal nature of childhood innocence, with minds unencumbered by the pressing issues consuming the world around them. The protaganist Amir bonds with the son of his father’s servant, Hassan. Though separated by class their hearts are knit together, but betrayal occurs and loyalty is tested, and cowardice is exposed. Human depravity will separate them emotionally, and the Russian army will drive them apart physically. But nothing can ultimately break the bond of childhood friendship.

Third, all of the tragedy and triumph in the story is tied together and reconciled by religious faith. We live our lives selfishly (sinfully), reaching a point where looking back we see the tragedy and brokenness our selfishness (sinfulness) has left in its wake, and we want to make it right. Yet time and circumstances make it impossible to set right what we have made so wrong. But there is a way to be good again. While I’m not certain I agree with the author’s way of being good again, he is certainly right in holding out that hope.

Khaled comes close to presenting the only true way that man can be made right when he has gone so wrong. In one brutal scene with two poignant images - one taking place in real time and the other a flashback to a religious ceremony marking Abraham’s attempted sacrifice of Isaac - we come face to face with the unpopular truth that redemption is made possible, not by our own works of righteousness, but through the sacrificial substitution of the innocent; the just for the unjust. Human sin requires an innocent substitute.

But to be good again Amir ultimately turns to Islam as a young man, a faith he rejected in his childhood because his father saw its abuse by legalistic Mullahs. Khaled draws a stark distinction between Islam as it is practiced by ordinary Muslims and its radical form imposed by the Taliban: the faithful prayers of the common people contrasted with the legalistic interpretations of the Koran by which the Taliban justified its reign of terror.

I’m still rethinking what this portrait of Islam means for my own understanding of the Islamic faith, as I have always believed that there is one Islam: radical, not peaceful. Is Khaled playing on my emotions, causing me to let my guard down in order to deceive me into believing that Islam is, after all, a peaceful religion?

The peace loving Muslims introduced in The Kite Runner all have their hopes in a legalistic religion which ultimately cannot give them true and lasting peace. Upon closing the last chapter I was moved with real compassion for observant Muslims, my heart crying out that they might come to know the Prince of Peace who has delivered us from the requirements of legalistic faiths like Islam, having become the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes. 

And finally, America is presented as a paradox and rightly so. The way in which Khaled presents America is not at all anti-American, but his portrait certainly causes us to celebrate the promise that is America while nearly in the same breath lamenting its excesses.

The movie opens in theatres everywhere on December 20. Having seen the trailer for the first time after finishing the book I have this gut-wrenching fear I’ll be disappointed by the movie. I’ll let you know.

X-ray reveals Jesus in his heart December 15, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Uncategorized.
4 comments

This from NBC affiliate WESH in Orlando, Florida:

A man who recently had a chest X-ray done swore he could clearly see the image of Jesus on the photograph.

The patient recently went to a hospital in Homestead and complained of chest pains.

The doctor ordered an X-ray, and when technicians put the film up to the light, the silhouette of what some said resembled Jesus Christ appeared.

Soul 4 Sale December 15, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in eBay.
2 comments

An American man is selling his soul to raise money for Christmas, Alex Watts reports for Sky News.

He says the winning eBay bidder will receive his spirit in a glass jar as well as a contract “relinquishing ownership”.He told buyers: “I’ve got no money for the Christmas holidays, and all I’ve got left to sell is my soul.

“I’m not really using it lately — and selling it on eBay is better than letting the Devil have it.”

If he’s a Mormon, better hope the brother of Jesus isn’t the winning bidder. :-)

HT: For the Love Blog

The Glory-Driven Life December 15, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Paul David Tripp, Purpose Driven Life, Rick Warren.
5 comments

On many levels I have always found Rick Warren’s Purpose-Driven Life problematic. Warren opens his book with the words, “It’s not about you,” and then proceeds for about 300 pages to talk about nothing but you under the guise of talking about God. Certainly the notion that we have a purpose is not an unbiblical one, but nevertheless the way Warren focuses that purpose seems to me to be more about using God’s purpose to attain our own ends rather than to truly come to understand what God’s end is.

The biblical alternative to The Purpose-Driven Life has just arrived and every pastor ought to be encouraging their people to read it if not outright leading their people through it. Paul David Tripp’s A Quest for More: Living for Something Bigger Than You is a God-saturated, kingdom focused approach to our purpose in life.

Warren says we were created for a purpose. Tripp says we were created to be a part of something big. Warren leaves it to the individual to determine what his or her purpose is. Tripp makes it clear that humanities purpose is the kingdom of God, not in some prophetic, in-the-future, sweet-by-and-by framework, but right now, in the here and now, in the mundane routine of our lives. Not only were we created for something big, but the pursuit of that something big is hardwired into our natures by our Creator.

This “hardwiring” for something bigger than ourselves is a result of what Tripp calls the “above and more” position of humans in the creation accounts of Genesis 1 and 2. Man is not the highest of animals. Man is above and apart from the animals and from everything else that God has made. Man was made for transcendence, to aspire to be a part of something outside of themselves, like a fan feels a part of a world championship without ever having participated in the success of the team. God’s purpose for us is not our own self-fulfillment and pleasure. God’s purpose for us transcends our own little kingdoms. Tripp says many believers have settled for “below and less” when we were created for “above and more.”

Living for a purpose isn’t enough. The key, says Tripp, is to recognize that we are hardwired for glory.

There are many people who have lived lives of purpose that didn’t really make much of a difference. Every person’s life is purposeful because every human being lives in pursuit of something. So, it is not enough to determine to have a purpose. Let me state it this way: it is a good thing to have a purpose, but if your purpose isn’t tied to glory, you have still denied your humanity.

Our purpose in life must be tied, Tripp says, to “four transcendent glories that were created to be the life-shaping focus of every human being. The first is the glory for which every human being is to live, and the following three are glories that flow from the first.”

  1. God glory. Our lives were designed to be shaped more by our attachment to the Creator than by creation.
  2. Stewardship glory. The transcendence of human beings is expressed as people reflect God’s glory by their rulership and stewardship over the surrounding created world.
  3. Community glory. Human being’s lives were meant to transcend the narrow glories of independence, autonomy, and self-sufficiency.
  4. Truth glory. God did something with Adam and Eve he didn’t do with the rest of creation: He spoke to them.  God spoke the secrets of His divine wisdom into the ears of the people He had made, calling Adam and Eve to transcend the boundaries of their own thoughts, interpretations, and experience.

Have you ever dreamed of being part of something big? What are you settling for?

Paul David Tripp will be my guest on Monday’s edition of The Paul Edwards Program.

Romney opened the door for Huckabee’s question December 15, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney.
9 comments

Did Romney open the door in his “Faith in America” speech for Huckabee’s “Jesus and Satan” question?

“There is one fundamental question about which I often am asked. What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind. My church’s beliefs about Christ may not all be the same as those of other faiths.

What does Romney believe about Jesus Christ that is different from what other faiths believe about Jesus Christ? He opened the door to this question.

Whatever Romney believes about Jesus Christ has NO BEARING on his qualifications for president. What Romney believes about Jesus Christ does, however, make a difference as to whether or not he is truly a Christian as he claims to be.

Politico’s misleading story on Huckabee December 14, 2007

Posted by Paul Edwards in Huckabee, Hugh Hewitt, Mike Huckabee, Politico.
1 comment so far

Hugh Hewitt is doing handstands over a story at Politico.com which implies Mike Huckabee, while Governor of Arkansas, took gifts from people whom he then rewarded with appointments to state positions.

The opening paragraph: 

Mike Huckabee accepted more than 90 gifts from 21 Arkansans he appointed to state posts during his decade as governor, a Politico analysis of state public records found.

The fifth paragraph:

Most of the posts Huckabee’s benefactors landed were on unpaid boards and commissions. Not all of the gifts came before the appointments — several came from old friends and there’s no clear evidence of any quid pro quo.

In other words, Politico is making much ado about nothing, hoping no one reads their piece beyond the headline and the first paragraph. Scorched-earth politics at its best.

Yet as the attacks on Huckabee increase, so do his poll numbers.