jump to navigation

Should a President honor the country he leads? March 18, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Barack Obama, Jeremiah Wright, Racism.
7 comments

Gregorio Allegri’s “Miserere” March 17, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Gregorio Allegri, Jesse Kornbluth, Miserere.
1 comment so far

Read Jesse Kornbluth’s very interesting story behind this piece of music and then hear it performed by King’s College Choir, Cambridge, in the YouTube video below. 

That “A” on Her Sweater Doesn’t Stand for “Ashley” March 14, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Ashley Alexandra Dupre, Eliot Spitzer.
1 comment so far

Why is Ashley Alexandra Dupre (aka, “Kristen,” the call girl at the center of the Eliot Spitzer scandal) not being held legally liable for her illegal “activities”? Instead she is being rewarded with flattering press coverage on the level of respect most foreign dignataries don’t receive from the American media. Playboy and Hustler are in a bidding war for her photo spread. And her cheesy song is being downloaded by the thousands at .98 cents a pop and played on Top 40 radio stations across the country. Her MySpace page has had more than 2.3 million visits since her name was revealed, and you can be certain some record label will make her the next “American Idol” without having to go through the hassle of waiting in line to hear Simon tell her, “You stink.”

Clearly Eliot Spitzer acted immorally. But he had a partner in his indiscretion. Is not Ashley’s indiscretion as immoral as the former governor’s? Why is our media culture rewarding her and crucifying him?

With the positive treatment she has received in the media, it’s clear the media is just as willing to pimp themselves out for a story just like a high-priced slut working out of a Manhatten penthouse.

Born Again Again March 14, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Bob Young.
35 comments

Bob Young has been my friend for nearly 35 years. He’s been the kind of friend that I have never felt compelled to agree wih 100% just so that he will remain my friend. In plainer words, ours is the kind of friendship where openness and honesty are the elements used as the “iron sharpens iron.” He challenges me and stretches me mentally and spiritually. He shared the following with me, and I’m sharing it with you with his permission.

GUEST BLOGGER: Bob Young

He was born in the summer of his 27th year
Comin’ home to a place he’d never been before.
He left yesterday behind him,
You might say he was born again,
You might say he found a key for every door.
John Denver
“Rocky Mountain High”

For me it was the autumn of my 46th year. It was a culmination of decades of learning and unlearning, a new beginning of sorts. A portal was opened to a new dimension of living, like walking into an ordinarywardrobe, clawing past the fur coats, and finding myself in Narnia. Shivering in the Narnian winter, clueless, alone, afraid, yet very much alive and very much full of wonder.

I was only part way through Rob Bell’s book “Velvet Elvis” when this shift started and this doorway opened before me. So much of what I had been taught for decades, entire schools and systems of biblical understanding, were being shown for the inadequate, inaccurate, man-made things they were.

And it all resonated deep within my heart – what I was reading was making so much more sense than the empty explanations I had heard all my life. It clicked with reality.

It started with simple things like “binding” and “loosing”. Rob discussed how scripture by its very nature had to be interpreted (something the rabbis knew for quite a long time). Some rabbis had very strict interpretations for passages in the Torah, while other rabbis were more lenient in how to apply it. In the end, however, the goal was to actually DO what the scriptures commanded, and the question was how.

When a rabbi forbid an activity, he was said to “bind” it; when he allowed the activity, he “loosed” it. The collection of the rabbi’s interpretations of what is “bound” and what is “loosed” in scripture was called the rabbi’s “yoke”. For anyone familiar with the book of Matthew in the New Testament, bells should start going off in your head, because the rabbi Jesus used these very terms with his apprentices.

He talked about how his “yoke” was easy, and later told his apprentices that they had the power to “bind” and “loose” (which they exercised in the book of Acts).

In some mysterious way, the apostles’ interpretation of scripture (which at that time consisted of Genesis to Malachi) had authority on earth AND in heaven. They partnered with God to determine what is allowed and what is not allowed. And if you look at their determinations in Acts, there were only a few things they bothered to “bind” or “loose” (though these days there are many who love to bind).

Anyway, that simple explanation from a Jewish historical context was mind-blowing to me. It made me wonder what else I had been taught wrongly simply because my teachers did not know (for one reason or another) the actual context of the passage, what the terms really meant to the speakers and hearers.

Rob included a number of concepts that he had learned from Ray Vander Laan, Dallas Willard, and other teachers – many that I had been exposed to for years – and brought out new perspectives and angles I had never heard before. I felt ashamed and excited, dumb and enlightened at the same time.

But the most devastating blow to my old way of thinking came as he gently addressed a common, glaring error in interpretation that is one of the key stops along the old “Romans Road”. I originally memorized the verse in the King James Version, and it went like this:

“That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe
in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.”
Romans 10:9

The English Standard Version of the scriptures translates that passage as follows:

“… if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in
your heart that God raised him from the dead,
you will be saved.”

Which, of course, meant that if I ask Jesus into my heart (perhaps confessing that I’m a sinner), and believe deep down inside that He as second person of the Trinity died for my sins and rose again, I have done a transaction that guarantees me an afterlife in heaven and an escape from the lake of fire. Right? But does it really mean that? Is that what the text really says?

When Paul wrote to the followers of Jesus in Rome, he was writing to a group of individuals who lived in the capital city of the civilized world. The military headquarters was there. The emperor was there… and he was considered to be a god. One of the requirements of Rome’s citizens was to honor him in ways that we’ve seen in the 20th century; where in Nazi Germany the people were required to shout with outstretched arm “Heil Hitler”, in Paul’s day Roman citizens were required to say “Caesar is Lord!” (whether you bought the whole emperor-god thing or not). If you wanted to survive, you said it.

Paul encouraged the followers of Jesus to participate in a dangerous and subversive activity – to go against the grain (at the risk of punishment or death) and say that Jesus, not Caesar, is the ruler. In other letters Paul reminds his readers that we are citizens of the kingdom of Heaven, not of the Roman Empire (though Paul gladly used his Roman citizenship to his advantage when appropriate). And the further you study the anti-Roman implications in Paul’s writings, the more you understand the subversive nature of his teachings and how he encouraged such a counter-cultural stand for God’s kingdom.

And what does the word “saved” mean in the context of Romans 10:9 if it doesn’t mean saved from hell and guaranteed access into an afterlife of bliss? Pretty much what it means in many other places in scripture when we use the synonyms “delivered”, “rescued”, and “protected”. Scan the Old Testament and you will see that over and over God delighted to rescue his people from danger. It’s the big story that his people get to gratefully recount to others – the various ways God came through for them in their time of need. Paul appears to be telling his readers don’t worry about taking a counter-cultural stand for Jesus as the king who rules over Caesar because Jesus will rescue them one way or another (either in this life so they can share their story, or they will be resurrected one day just like Him).

Wow. So what else have I gotten wrong? What else did my teachers not know, did not interpret (binding or loosing) correctly and accurately? And if it’s not about securing a good spot in the afterlife, what IS it about? For that, I had to go back to the teachings of Jesus himself…

Studying Jesus’ teachings led me back to the writings of Dallas Willard and his landmark book “The Divine Conspiracy”. Though I’ve read it twice before, I had completely missed the implications; perhaps I wasn’t ready yet. But as he discussed the failure of “gospel of sin management” to really foster Christlikeness and as he expanded on the brilliance of Jesus’ teachings that we call “the sermon on the mount”, my eyes were opened and my heart humbled and my spirit was shaken by the possibilities. And that led me to others who have been influenced by his writings, including Scot McKnight, Rick
McKinley, and Brian McLaren. It also led me back to John Eldredge who was an influence on me several years ago as his writings prepared me to live authentically and stop being a “poser”, in spite of the resistance. And that led me back to the songwriters I’ve come to love for their honesty and integrity…

Don’t forget to bring kindness
Don’t forget to say “thanks!”
Don’t forget to spend your love
Honey, you will not break the bank
Don’t forget to bring some empathy
For the saints and the sinners
Don’t forget to bring encouragement
Yeah, we’re all just beginners.
Bill Mallonee
“Bank”

That’s me – just another beginner, just another humbled, desperate soul trying to follow the way of Jesus. I hesitate to even call myself a Christian anymore because the term is so over-used that it can mean just about anything, which in the end indicates that it means nothing. And if it is supposed to mean “Christ-like” or “little Christ”, well, that ain’t me. But I’m trying…

Honesty is a hard attribute to find
When we all want to seem like
we’ve got it all figured out
Well let me be the first to say that I
don’t have a clue
I don’t have all the answers
ain’t gonna’ pretend like I do
Just trying to find my way
trying to find my way the best that I know how
Jason Wade / Lifehouse
“Trying”

It’s a world filled with doubts and questions. But I guess I’m not afraid of that anymore, because the God who created all of this and who has rescued (saved!) me time and time again – well, he’s not afraid of the questions either. And questions are exactly what inquisitive children are supposed to bring to their father. And it’s not that I don’t look forward to an afterlife with him – I do – but more importantly I look forward to his presence in my here and now every single day as I see his wishes become my reality. And I think puts me in a better position to be humble, perhaps like a child, as I seek to follow him in faith.

Steve Harvey Introduces Jesus March 13, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Steve Harvey.
7 comments

Thanks to my nephew, Mike Edwards, for forwarding me this video:

“ER” Confronts the Emergent Church March 12, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in ER, Emergent, Emergent Church.
38 comments

The following YouTube clip of a recent episode of “ER” speaks VOLUMES about the Emergent Church. Thanks to my friend Justin Hermiz for pointing me to it:

Death is Dead! March 10, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Keith Getty, Resurrection Hymn, Stuart Townend.
add a comment

One of the blessings I thank God for every day is Jon Busch. Jon is the worship pastor at my church, a position he serves with joy even in the midst of so many other demands on his time as a husband, father, and music teacher. I never cease to be amazed at how God uses Jon to plan and prepare excellent worship, finding just the right hymns to convey God’s word for the moment. Such was yesterday’s experience in worship when Jon lead us in Stuart Townend’s and Keith Getty’s Resurrection Hymn (See, What a Morning!). I couldn’t stay in my seat. See if you have the same reaction after watching the video below of Stuart Townend leading his hymn:

Obama’s selective reading of Scripture March 5, 2008

Posted by Paul Edwards in Barack Obama, Homosexuality.
15 comments

The Democrats this year discovered that being a “Christian” has political advantages. Both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama have dipped into the religion well as frequently as possible during their campaigns. But Barack Obama may have fallen into the well with a statement he made earlier this week, citing the Sermon on the Mount as justification for legal rights for homosexual couples. Here’s the quote in full:

I will tell you that I don’t believe in gay marriage. But I do think people who are gay and lesbian should be treated with dignity and respect and that the state should not discriminate against them. So, I believe in civil unions that will allow a same-sex couple to visit each other in the hospital, or transfer property to each other. I don’t think it should be called marriage, but I think that it is a legal right that they should have that is recognized by the state. If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans.

The Senator from Illinois needs some basic tutoring in biblical exegesis. For one thing, where exactly in the Sermon on the Mount did Jesus advocate for civil unions for same-sex couples? Where in the Sermon on the Mount does Jesus detail the responsibilities of the STATE to its citizens? The Sermon on the Mount is Jesus’ spiritual instructions to his own followers (Matthew 5:1,2) not a treatise on citizenship. Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount applies to those who are related to one another spiritually through Him, not to those who share a common citizenship through a state. Only those who can truly call God “Our Father” have any interest at all in what Jesus is saying in the Sermon on the Mount.

Beyond that, what makes the Romans passage “obscure”? We can only assume that the Romans passage Senator Obama is referring to is Romans 1:26,27. The best exegesis of this passage I have ever read comes from John Piper and you can read it or listen to it in two parts: part one, part two. The Romans passage is the most definitive word from the Holy Spirit in all of Scripture on homosexual behavior. The only sense in which the passage could be described as “obscure” would be that it offends the sensibilities of liberals like Senator Obama who have a low view of Scripture and believe that because the passage offends them they can merely ignore it.

Barack Obama is another fine example of the new “Red Letter Christians” who ask “How would Jesus respond to homosexuals,” determining Jesus’ response not by what is clearly written in Scripture but rather by reading the “white space” between the red letters, reading into the text their own liberal orthodoxy. See my Townhall.com column for more on that.